Blogtastic!
The firegrid Blog. Thoughts, humour, ranting and general randomness. Wowzers!

Categories

Show all  (123 Posts)
Design and Graphics  (4 Posts)
Gaming  (24 Posts)
Humour  (18 Posts)
Internet and Technology  (16 Posts)
Personal  (14 Posts)
Random Stuff  (18 Posts)
Website News  (29 Posts)
Thu 20th March 2008

o2 Cocoon's have been returned


Filed under: Personal

Ok, in an earlier post I raved about the o2 Cocoon, but this post tells a different story.  Please read on should you be considering purchasing one.

Now, while I still maintain the styling is brilliant, as are the music capabilities, the phone itself has a few problems which cannot be ignored.

1.  Battery Life - It has been said on numerous other sites that the battery life was poor, and this is indeed true.  I still maintain that the battery low indictaor comes on too early, but even so you can expect 4 days max out of it with little or no use.

2.  Call Quality - When making a call, the sound is muffled and very hard to hear.  It sounds as though the caller is just mumbling at the other end of the line - I was constantly saying "Pardon?" and "What?" when talking to someone using the Cocoon.

3.  Reliability - This is what finally clinched it for me in the end.  My phone stopped making calls all together.  If I rang someone, I would get "Call Failed" on the screen yet their phone would keep ringing.  Likewise, if they rang me and I answered the call, the phone would drop the call and display "Call Failed" on the screen yet the caller would hear the ringing sound down their earpiece.  Weird eh?

I had actually purchased two of these phones, one for me and one for my wife, both died with the same fault within a day of each other!  31 days after the purchase date!

My wife now has the brilliant little Moto U9 in purple, and I opted for the Samsung SGH-U600.

While the o2 Cocoon may be a joy to look at, I'm afraid I lost all my faith in it as a phone - it was just too unreliable.
 
Comments

There are currently no comments for this article.
Add a comment to this article
Name
Email Address (Not Published)
Website (Optional)
Comments
Verification